math.CO — Combinatorics
Strongly regular graphs on 160, 232, 261 and 280 vertices from fusions of orbitals of PΓL(2,8) and 2^4:(S3×S3)
We construct strongly regular graphs with parameters (160,54,18,18), (232,63,14,18), (261,64,14,16) and (280,63,14,14), and hence also their complements. All four parameter sets were marked "?" (existence unknown) in Brouwer's online table on 11 and 12 October 2026; they are the parameters of the hypothetical partial geometries pg(9,5,3), pg(7,8,2), pg(8,7,2) and pg(9,6,2). We give eight pairwise non-isomorphic graphs: three on 160 vertices, one on 232, two on 261 and two on 280. None of them is geometric. As far as we can determine, they are the first graphs known with these parameters. Five of the graphs have a short description over the projective line PG(1,8) and its quadratic extension PG(1,64). The vertices are pairs of points of PG(1,8) or conjugate pairs of points of PG(1,64) ∖ PG(1,8), each carrying a label in 𝔽_8*, together with a small orbit of points, pairs, or conjugate pairs. Adjacency is decided by cross ratios: for two labelled vertices on disjoint pairs, the quotient (or the product) of the two labels must equal the cross ratio of the two pairs or its inverse; for pairs sharing a point it must equal 1, and a labelled pair and a conjugate pair are adjacent when their cross ratio is a primitive cube root of unity. The "quotient" graphs on 232, 261 and 280 vertices have the automorphism group (SL(2,8) × C_7) ⋊ C_6 ≅ GL(2,8) ⋊ C_6 of order 21168; the two "product" graphs have C_2 × PΓL(2,8), of order 3024. One graph on 160 vertices lives on the 16 cells of a 4 × 4 grid and three copies of the 48 flags of its even transversals; its automorphism group is C_3 × 2^4:(S_3 × S_3), of order 1728. The other two graphs on 160 vertices have automorphism groups of orders 1728 and 576. The graphs were found by a computer search over fusions of orbitals of groups acting with two or three orbits, using the GAP library of tables of marks; the search reported five graphs, and enumerating all fusions of the same group actions gave three more. We do not classify the graphs with these parameters. The same constructions over PG(1,q) give, for q=4, the classical skew-lines graph of PG(3,2) and a second known srg(35,16,6,8), and no strongly regular graph for q=16 or q=32 under the groups searched (complete solver verdicts): within this model the graphs for q=8 appear to be sporadic. Strong regularity of every graph is checked by an exact, standalone, standard-library Python program, the constructions are re-implemented from the text of this paper, and all computer results were reproduced by an independent audit with separately written code and checked again by a referee with its own code. Also deposited on Zenodo with the full data archive (the citable record): https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23313399