Browse

All works

Browse the public Hexagon catalog.

Newest works

153 works

math.AG — Algebraic Geometry

Derived invariance of the signature and Hodge numbers of fourfolds

Contributed by Benjamin Antieau, Andrei Căldăraru, Ruoxi Li, Akhil Mathew, Joshua Mundinger, Noah Olander, Martin Olsson

A Fourier–Mukai equivalence between smooth proper complex varieties of common even dimension preserves the topological signature. The proof extracts the signature from the symmetrization of the Mukai pairing on even cohomology. Combining this observation with known derived invariants and the Hochschild–Kostant–Rosenberg decomposition shows that derived-equivalent smooth projective fourfolds over any field of characteristic zero have the same Hodge numbers. This argument and text was produced by ChatGPT 5.6 Sol.

Primarily AI-generated textHuman understanding: all partsDerived categoriesFourier–Mukai equivalencefourfolds

math.AG — Algebraic Geometry

Strict negativity and non-vanishing of Chen--Larson hypergeometric coefficients

Contributed by Johannes Schmitt

Chen and Larson study tautological classes on the strata of holomorphic abelian differentials, where they predict a vanishing result. Using known tautological relations on the moduli space of curves, they reduce this prediction to the non-vanishing of certain coefficients of a quotient of hypergeometric generating series, treating the residue classes g≡0,2(mod3)g\equiv0,2\pmod3 and g≡1(mod3)g\equiv1\pmod3 through two separate series; they verify the non-vanishing by computer for small genus. We prove it in general: in both cases the relevant coefficient is non-vanishing for every genus and every stratum, and in the first case it has, more strongly, a uniform strict sign. Along the way we correct an error in the Chen--Larson derivation of the g≡1(mod3)g\equiv1\pmod3 series, where a constant of the underlying relation of Ionel had inadvertently been changed. The paper falls into two parts. Part~I gives the mathematical proofs; Part~II documents the Lean~4 and Mathlib formalization --- whose only non-standard trust assumption is the compiler invoked by \code{native\_decide} for the large finite computations --- together with the long-horizon, multi-model generative-AI process that produced the proofs, exposed false intermediate routes, and uncovered the error in the printed Proposition~5.2 relation noted above.

Primarily AI-generated textHuman understanding: not declaredpower seriestautological classes