Matching works

2 works

math.NT — Number Theory

A lattice-theoretic approach to the abc conjecture: Weighted arithmetic derivatives, a master inequality, and the structure of the residual family

Contributed by Zeng Chunping

We develop a self-contained lattice-theoretic framework for the abc conjecture. For coprime positive integers a+b=ca+b=c with k=ω(ab)k=\omega(ab), the framework rests on a weighted arithmetic derivative dψd^\psi whose additivity equation dψ(a+b)=dψ(a)+dψ(b)d^\psi(a+b)=d^\psi(a)+d^\psi(b) is solvable modulo the modulus gc=gcd⁡p∥c(cpvp(c))g_c=\gcd_{p\parallel c}\bigl(\frac{c}{p}v_p(c)\bigr), and on a Wronskian identity W=a dψ(b)−b dψ(a)=Mab H(u)W=a\,d^\psi(b)-b\,d^\psi(a)=M_{ab}\,H(u), where Mab=ab/rad⁡(ab)M_{ab}=ab/\operatorname{rad}(ab) and HH is an explicit linear form. A divisibility lemma MaMbMc∣WM_aM_bM_c\mid W and an elementary upper bound yield the master inequality c≤μab⋅Ω(ab)2⋅rad⁡(abc)c\le\mu_{ab}\cdot\frac{\Omega(ab)}{2}\cdot\operatorname{rad}(abc), in which the defect factor μab\mu_{ab} is the shortest non-kernel weight of an explicit solution lattice Λ\Lambda of determinant gc/gg_c/g. Writing η=log⁡μab/log⁡c\eta=\log\mu_{ab}/\log c, geometry-of-numbers input (Hermite's bound and an orthogonal covering-radius sandwich; an earlier ``min--max barrier'' is falsified in Theorem 4.5) yields, conditionally on an explicit gap hypothesis (⋆′)(\star') isolated in Section 7, the bound η≤1k+o(1)\eta\le\frac1k+o(1), whence lim sup⁡c→∞q(a,b,c)≤kk−1≤2\limsup_{c\to\infty}q(a,b,c)\le\frac{k}{k-1}\le2, i.e.\ c≲rad⁡(abc)2+o(1)c\lesssim\operatorname{rad}(abc)^{2+o(1)}. On the subclass a+b=rea+b=r^e the method closes unconditionally (Zsigmondy for r≥3r\ge3; cyclotomic/LTE control of valuations for a=1a=1). The residual family is localized by a power--congruence bridge: qV∥bq^V\parallel b forces ee into a single residue class modulo d qV−sd\,q^{V-s} (d=ord⁡q(r)d=\operatorname{ord}_q(r), ss the Wieferich depth), of convergent total density; the unique unclosed layer reduces to growth-difference Pillai-type equations. We also prove a structural ceiling: the main term of η\eta is at most 1k+o(1)\frac1k+o(1) and attains 1k\frac1k on the family c=rec=r^e, so the full abc conjecture (q≤1+εq\le1+\varepsilon) is structurally unreachable inside this framework. A final section determines the reach and limits of the method elementarily: almost all cc have every coprime decomposition with q≤1+o(1)q\le1+o(1) (density theorem, by one-variable counting, exceptional set ≪X1/2+o(1)\ll X^{1/2+o(1)}), while any argument within the method class M\mathcal M cannot prove lim sup⁡q≤α\limsup q\le\alpha for any α<2\alpha<2 (obstacle theorem), and the only remaining channel is equivalent to a sparse growth-difference Pillai core. All statements are proved in full or are explicitly labelled as working hypotheses; numerical cross-checks from two independent implementations are included, and no claim of a proof of the abc conjecture is made.

A mix of human-written and AI-generated textHuman understanding: all partsPillai equationWronskianabc conjecturedensity theoremerratalattice methodmaster inequalityobstacle theoremweighted arithmetic derivative

math.NT — Number Theory

An Integral-Structure Inflation in the Hull Operation of IUT Corollary 3.12

Contributed by Zeng Chunping

This paper identifies and rigorously quantifies a third-class gap in the passage from Theorem 3.11 to Corollary 3.12 in S. Mochizuki's inter-universal Teichmuller theory (IUT). It occupies the same position as, but is of a different type from, and neither implies nor is implied by, the Scholze-Stix gap (non-commutativity of the j2j^2-scaling) and the compatibility gap (9-1) recorded in the LANA project. The holomorphic hull of IUT III, Remark 3.9.5, is the minimum over the constrained family {λ⋅O}\{\lambda \cdot \mathcal{O}\}: each direct summand of IQ≅⨁αFαI^{\mathbb{Q}} \cong \bigoplus_{\alpha} F_{\alpha} is scaled independently. This operation "boxes" the image of the tensor-product integral structure and introduces an index ρ\rho. The main mathematical result of this paper is the exact closed form of this index, ρ=∣dK∣(n−1)dn−1/2\rho = |\mathfrak{d}_K|^{(n-1)d^{n-1}/2}, d=[K:Qp]d = [K:\mathbb{Q}_p], proved as an identity of positive integers (not merely a pp-adic valuation), where dK\mathfrak{d}_K is the discriminant of K/QpK/\mathbb{Q}_p. Its pp-adic corollary is vp(ρ)=(n−1)dn−12 vp(dK)v_p(\rho) = \frac{(n-1)d^{n-1}}{2}\, v_p(\mathfrak{d}_K): the loss equals n−12\frac{n-1}{2} times (number of components) times (the pp-adic valuation of the local discriminant). The formula is uniform for tame and wild ramification, with no extra term; wild ramification only replaces the tame value (d−1)(d-1) by the actual vp(dK)v_p(\mathfrak{d}_K). Substituting IUT's own parameters (n=j+1n = j+1, ℓ∗=(ℓ−1)/2≍h1/2\ell^* = (\ell-1)/2 \asymp h^{1/2}, v∈Vbadv \in V^{\mathrm{bad}}), the inflation is doubly exponential: log⁡log⁡ρ=Θ(h)\log\log\rho = \Theta(\sqrt{h}), i.e. ρ=exp⁡(exp⁡(Θ(h)))\rho = \exp(\exp(\Theta(\sqrt{h}))). Measured by the crossover scale h∗(κ)h^*(\kappa), the conclusion is robust: even if the target bound were as generous as h1000h^{1000}, the d=2d = 2 inflation overtakes it at h≈4×109h \approx 4\times 10^{9} and the d=4d = 4 inflation at h≈9×108h \approx 9\times 10^{8}. This paper is not a verdict on IUT. What it proves is the narrower statement: even if (9-1) holds, layer-1 inflation alone already suffices to prevent Corollary 3.12 from yielding abc.

Primarily human-written textHuman understanding: all partsinter-universal Teichmuller theory,abc conjecture,holomorphic hull

Advanced search

Text
Human understanding
Linked formalizations