Inertia and Elementary Theories of Hermitian Nilpotent Operators

Primarily human-written textHuman understanding: some partsmath.LO — Logicmath.RA — Rings and Algebras

Contributed by Zhenyu Sun ↗, Jilin Wang ↗

Version 1 / Nov 04, 2026 / CC BY 4.0

Abstract

Let VV be a finite-dimensional Hermitian space over an algebraically closed field with a nonidentity involution, and suppose its form hh is nondegenerate. For a self-adjoint nilpotent operator NN, we recover the multiplicity of each signed Jordan block from finite differences of the ranks and signature differences of the forms h(x,Njy)h(x,N^j y). On a fixed Hermitian space these inertias classify unitary conjugacy. Across scalar fields they classify elementary equivalence in the four-sorted language of scalars, vectors, endomorphisms, and projective points with NN named. At fixed dimension each admissible inertia sequence isolates a complete theory. These theories are model complete and decidable, and none has the independence property. A bivariate generating function counts them by ambient signature. For two self-adjoint square-zero operators with a common image of fixed positive dimension and positive definite quotient forms, simultaneous unitary conjugacy on a fixed Hermitian space is classified by the ordered generalized eigenvalues. The associated Hermitian pencil recovers these eigenvalues even when all operator words have constant ranks and inertias. At fixed signature and rank the family theory is model complete and decidable. Its completions correspond to the ordered-field types of the spectrum, and each completion has the Turing degree of its type. We also characterize the Witt index by square-zero ranks over arbitrary fields with involution. For positive definite spaces we prove that finite-measurement sentences at fixed dimensions and outcome count have the same truth value over R(−1)R(\sqrt{-1}) as over C\mathbb C for every real closed field RR. The least Naimark dilation dimension of a measurement is the sum of its effect ranks.

Provenance statement

The manuscript is primarily human-written. OpenAI Codex assisted with editing the English prose, checking consistency between statements and proofs, and preparing the LaTeX source. The accompanying Python script uses exact rational arithmetic for the finite checks reported in the appendix. At the time of submission, parts of the manuscript have been checked and understood by a human.

References

  1. Camilo Enrique Argoty Pulido . Model theory of a Hilbert space expanded with an unbounded closed selfadjoint operator. Mathematical Logic Quarterly , 60 0 (6): 0 403--424, 2014. 10.1002/malq.201110043.DOI
  2. Emil Artin and Otto Schreier. Algebraische Konstruktion reeller K ö rper. Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universit ä t Hamburg , 5 0 (1): 0 85--99, 1927 a . 10.1007/BF02952512.DOI
  3. Emil Artin and Otto Schreier. Eine Kennzeichnung der reell abgeschlossenen K ö rper. Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universit ä t Hamburg , 5 0 (1): 0 225--231, 1927 b . 10.1007/BF02952522.DOI
  4. Garrett Birkhoff and John von Neumann. The logic of quantum mechanics. Annals of Mathematics , 37 0 (4): 0 823--843, 1936. 10.2307/1968621.DOI
  5. Olivier Brunet. A formal theory for finite-dimensional possibilistic quantum mechanics, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16368. Preprint.link
  6. Paul Busch, Pekka Lahti, Juha-Pekka Pellonp ä ä , and Kari Ylinen. Quantum Measurement . Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. Springer, Cham, 2016. ISBN 978-3-319-43387-5. 10.1007/978-3-319-43389-9.DOI
  7. Gianni Cassinelli and Pekka Lahti. Quantum mechanics: why complex Hilbert space? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , 375 0 (2106): 0 20160393, 2017. 10.1098/rsta.2016.0393.DOI
  8. Cl é ment de Seguins Pazzis . Sums of two square-zero selfadjoint or skew-selfadjoint endomorphisms. Linear Algebra and its Applications , 693: 0 140--213, 2024. 10.1016/j.laa.2023.06.020.DOI
  9. J. Michael Dunn, Tobias J. Hagge, Lawrence S. Moss, and Zhenghan Wang. Quantum logic as motivated by quantum computing. The Journal of Symbolic Logic , 70 0 (2): 0 353--359, 2005. 10.2178/jsl/1120224716.DOI
  10. J. Michael Dunn, Lawrence S. Moss, and Zhenghan Wang. Editors' introduction: The third life of quantum logic: Quantum logic inspired by quantum computing. Journal of Philosophical Logic , 42: 0 443--459, 2013. 10.1007/s10992-013-9273-7.DOI
Show all 24 referencesShow fewer references
  1. Israel Gohberg, Peter Lancaster, and Leiba Rodman. Indefinite Linear Algebra and Applications . Birkh ä user, Basel, 2005. ISBN 978-3-7643-7349-8. 10.1007/b137517.DOI
  2. Stanley P. Gudder and Constantin Piron. Observables and the field in quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 12 0 (8): 0 1583--1588, 1971. 10.1063/1.1665777.DOI
  3. Roger A. Horn and Charles R. Johnson. Matrix Analysis . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 2013. 10.1017/CBO9781139020411.DOI
  4. David Marker. Model Theory: An Introduction , volume 217 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer, New York, 2002. 10.1007/b98860.DOI
  5. Christian Mehl. On classification of normal matrices in indefinite inner product spaces. Electronic Journal of Linear Algebra , 15: 0 50--83, 2006. 10.13001/1081-3810.1220. URL https://journals.uwyo.edu/index.php/ela/article/view/365.DOI
  6. Christian Mehl. On the existence of Schur -like forms for matrices with symmetry structures. Vietnam Journal of Mathematics , 48: 0 831--845, 2020. 10.1007/s10013-020-00394-3.DOI
  7. Juha-Pekka Pellonp ä ä , S é bastien Designolle, and Roope Uola. Naimark dilations of qubit POVM s and joint measurements. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 56 0 (15): 0 155303, 2023. 10.1088/1751-8121/acc21c.DOI
  8. Winfried Scharlau. Quadratic and Hermitian Forms , volume 270 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften . Springer, Berlin, 1985. 10.1007/978-3-642-69971-8.DOI
  9. Benjamin Schumacher and Michael D. Westmoreland. Modal quantum theory. Foundations of Physics , 42 0 (7): 0 918--925, 2012. 10.1007/s10701-012-9650-z.DOI
  10. Vladimir V. Sergeichuk. Classification problems for systems of forms and linear mappings. Mathematics of the USSR-Izvestiya , 31 0 (3): 0 481--501, 1988. 10.1070/IM1988v031n03ABEH001086.DOI
  11. Koen Thas. General quantum theory---unification of classical and modal quantum theories. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 53 0 (39): 0 395304, 2020. 10.1088/1751-8121/aba307.DOI
  12. Koen Thas. Quantum theory without the axiom of choice, and Lefschetz quantum physics. Physics , 5 0 (4): 0 1109--1125, 2023. 10.3390/physics5040072.DOI
  13. Lou van den Dries. Tame Topology and o-Minimal Structures , volume 248 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998. 10.1017/CBO9780511525919.DOI
  14. Yingte Xu, Gilles Barthe, and Li Zhou. Automating equational proofs in Dirac notation. Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages , 9 0 (POPL): 0 1227--1259, January 2025. Article 42. 10.1145/3704878.DOI

Version history

  1. v1Submitted by Zhenyu SunInitial depositCurrentNov 04, 2026