Counterexamples to log-concavity of cluster monomials and theta structure constants
Version 1 / Oct 31, 2026 / CC BY 4.0
Abstract
Provenance statement
References
- P. Brändén and J. Huh, Lorentzian polynomials , Ann. of Math. 192 (2020), 821--891. doi:10.4007/annals.2020.192.3.4 (https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2020.192.3.4).DOI
- Z. Chen, Log-concavity and unimodality of cluster monomials of type , arXiv:2601.21496v4 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21496v4) (2026).arXiv
- Z. Chen, G. Huang and Z. Sun, Log-concavity of cluster algebras of type , Nagoya Math. J. 261 (2026), e28, 1--19. doi:10.1017/nmj.2026.10110 (https://doi.org/10.1017/nmj.2026.10110).DOI
- Z. Chen and Z. Sun, Log-concavity and unimodality of cluster monomials in fan coordinates of type , arXiv:2610.09312v1 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09312v1) (2026).arXiv
- C. Chindris, H. Derksen and J. Weyman, Counterexamples to Okounkov's log-concavity conjecture , Compos. Math. 143 (2007), 1545--1557. doi:10.1112/S0010437X07003090 (https://doi.org/10.1112/S0010437X07003090).DOI
- S. Fomin and A. Zelevinsky, Cluster algebras I: Foundations , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (2002), 497--529. arXiv:math/0104151 (https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0104151).arXiv
- S. Fomin and A. Zelevinsky, Cluster algebras II: Finite type classification , Invent. Math. 154 (2003), 63--121. doi:10.1007/s00222-003-0302-y (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-003-0302-y).DOI
- M. Gross, P. Hacking, S. Keel and M. Kontsevich, Canonical bases for cluster algebras , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 31 (2018), 497--608. arXiv:1411.1394v2 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.1394v2).arXiv
- J. Huh, J. P. Matherne, K. Mészáros and A. St. Dizier, Logarithmic concavity of Schur and related polynomials , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 375 (2022), 4411--4427. doi:10.1090/tran/8606 (https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/8606).DOI
- W. Kang, K. Lee and E. Lim, Unimodality and cluster algebras from surfaces , European J. Combin. 136 (2026), 104392. doi:10.1016/j.ejc.2026.104392 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejc.2026.104392); arXiv:2508.04396v3 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.04396v3).arXivDOI
Show all 20 referencesShow fewer references
- E. Kantarc Oğuz and M. Ravichandran, Rank polynomials of fence posets are unimodal , Discrete Math. 346 (2023), 113218. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2022.113218 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2022.113218).DOI
- K. Lee and R. Schiffler, Positivity for cluster algebras , Ann. of Math. 182 (2015), 73--125. doi:10.4007/annals.2015.182.1.2 (https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2015.182.1.2).DOI
- S. Liu, Rethlas-OSV: Desktop Math Agents for Mathematicians , 29 September 2026, updated 20 October 2026. https://srliu.com/blog/rethlas-osv-guide/.link
- S. Morier-Genoud and V. Ovsienko, -deformed rationals and -continued fractions , Forum Math. Sigma 8 (2020), e13. doi:10.1017/fms.2020.9 (https://doi.org/10.1017/fms.2020.9).DOI
- G. Musiker, R. Schiffler and L. Williams, Positivity for cluster algebras from surfaces , Adv. Math. 227 (2011), 2241--2308. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2011.04.018 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2011.04.018).DOI
- F. Nie, H. Ye, S. Liu, Z. Wang, S. Ermon and J. Zou, One-Sided Verification Under Limited Expert Review , arXiv:2610.18089v2 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18089v2) (2026).arXiv
- A. Okounkov, Why would multiplicities be log-concave? , in The Orbit Method in Geometry and Physics, Progr. Math. 213 , Birkhäuser, Boston, 2003, 329--347. arXiv:math/0002085 (https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0002085).arXiv
- R. Schiffler, A cluster expansion formula ( case) , Electron. J. Combin. 15 (2008), R64. doi:10.37236/788 (https://doi.org/10.37236/788).DOI
- L. Shen, Stasheff polytopes and the coordinate ring of the cluster -variety of type , Selecta Math. (N.S.) 20 (2014), 929--959. arXiv:1104.3528v2 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.3528v2).arXiv
- R. P. Stanley, Log-concave and unimodal sequences in algebra, combinatorics, and geometry , Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 576 (1989), 500--535. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1989.tb16434.x (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1989.tb16434.x).DOI
Version history
- v1Submitted by Qiyue TangInitial depositCurrentOct 30, 2026