Square-difference-free sets of exponent 0.7580758

Primarily AI-generated textHuman understanding: some partsmath.CO — Combinatoricsmath.NT — Number Theory

Contributed by Eric Naslund ↗

Version 1 / Oct 08, 2026 / CC BY 4.0

Abstract

Let D(N)D(N) be the largest cardinality of a subset of {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} containing no two elements whose difference is a nonzero perfect square. We give a computer-assisted construction proving D(N)≥N0.7580758318008816−o(1)D(N)\ge N^{0.7580758318008816-o(1)}, improving the exponent 0.752796455874514…0.752796455874514\ldots of Krachun's ranked-block construction. The residues we use carry subintervals of [0,1][0,1] that are ordered along every modular square difference. A finite stopping-word argument shows that if finitely many such alphabets, in pairwise coprime perfect-square moduli, have interval moments whose contributions sum to more than α\alpha, then α\alpha is an attainable exponent. Krachun's prime chains reproduce his exponent in this framework. The gain comes from an alphabet modulo a power of 44, built by a 2525-state recursion, and from two composite alphabets, at the primes 5,435,43 and at 19,2319,23, in which the first differing digit is read separately at each prime. The numerical conclusion is computer-assisted. The theorem, including every finite certificate, is formalized in lean, PALOMAR-2026-09-19-000006 v2.

Provenance statement

This paper was written by GPT-6-Astra and revised by Claude Opus 5.5 under my prompting and supervision. The core argument I understand well, but have not carefully read some of the optimizations, and why the AI believes that this is the limit of the method through exhaustive searching.
FormalizationsPalomar

Tools used

Anthropic
Claude OpusVersion 5.5
OpenAI
ChatGPTVersion Astra 6

References

  1. H. Furstenberg, Ergodic behavior of diagonal measures and a theorem of Szemerédi on arithmetic progressions , J. Analyse Math. 31 (1977), 204--256. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02813304 doi:10.1007/BF02813304 .DOI
  2. A. Sárközy, On difference sets of sequences of integers. I , Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 31 (1978), no. 1--2, 125--149. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01896079 doi:10.1007/BF01896079 .DOI
  3. J. Pintz, W. L. Steiger, and E. Szemerédi, On sets of natural numbers whose difference set contains no squares , J. London Math. Soc. (2) 37 (1988), no. 2, 219--231. https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s2-37.2.219 doi:10.1112/jlms/s2-37.2.219 .DOI
  4. T. F. Bloom and J. Maynard, A new upper bound for sets with no square differences , Compos. Math. 158 (2022), no. 8, 1777--1798. https://doi.org/10.1112/S0010437X22007679 doi:10.1112/S0010437X22007679 .DOI
  5. B. Green and M. Sawhney, New bounds for the Furstenberg--Sárközy theorem , 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.17448v2 arXiv:2411.17448v2 (first version 2024).arXiv
  6. I. Z. Ruzsa, Difference sets without squares , Period. Math. Hungar. 15 (1984), no. 3, 205--209. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02454169 doi:10.1007/BF02454169 .DOI
  7. R. Beigel and W. Gasarch, Square-difference-free sets of size (n0.7334) (n^ 0.7334 ) , 2008, https://arxiv.org/abs/0804.4892v3 arXiv:0804.4892v3 .arXiv
  8. M. Lewko, An improved lower bound related to the Furstenberg--Sárközy theorem , Electron. J. Combin. 22 (2015), no. 1, Paper 1.32, 6 pp. https://doi.org/10.37236/4656 doi:10.37236/4656 .DOI
  9. M. R. Gabdullin, Sets in Zm Z_m whose difference sets avoid squares , Sb. Math. 209 (2018), no. 11, 1603--1610. https://doi.org/10.1070/SM8992 doi:10.1070/SM8992 .DOI
  10. B. Georgiev, J. Gómez-Serrano, T. Tao, and A. Z. Wagner, Mathematical exploration and discovery at scale , 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.02864v1 arXiv:2511.02864v1 .arXiv
  11. E. Naslund, Paley graphs and Sárközy's theorem in function fields , 2022, https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.01293v3 arXiv:2203.01293v3 , Conjecture 13.arXiv
  12. JD Jones, ns-lean: Naslund's Conjecture 13 is false at q=3q=3, k=2k=2, for every nn congruent to 00 mod 44 with n8n 8 , Palomar, entry https://palomar-registry.org/entry?id=PALOMAR-2026-09-17-000003&version=1 PALOMAR-2026-09-17-000003 , version 1, 17 September 2026.link
  13. D. Krachun, Square-difference-free sets beyond the three-quarter barrier , 2026, https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01325v1 arXiv:2608.01325v1 .arXiv
  14. S. Satake, On the restricted isometry property of the Paley matrix , Linear Algebra Appl. 631 (2021), 35--47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2021.08.018 doi:10.1016/j.laa.2021.08.018 .DOI
  15. L. de Moura and S. Ullrich, The Lean 4 theorem prover and programming language , in Automated Deduction---CADE 28 , A. Platzer and G. Sutcliffe (eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 12699 , Springer, Cham, 2021, 625--635. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79876-5_37 doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79876-5_37 .DOI
  16. The mathlib Community, The Lean mathematical library , in Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Certified Programs and Proofs (CPP 2020) , Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2020, 367--381. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372885.3373824 doi:10.1145/3372885.3373824 .DOI
  17. T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory , second ed., Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/047174882X doi:10.1002/047174882X .DOI
  18. R. P. Stanley, Two poset polytopes , Discrete Comput. Geom. 1 (1986), 9--23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187680 doi:10.1007/BF02187680 .DOI
  19. E. Seneta, Non-negative Matrices and Markov Chains , second ed., Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, New York, 1981, reprinted 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-32792-4 doi:10.1007/0-387-32792-4 .DOI
  20. R. E. Moore, R. B. Kearfott, and M. J. Cloud, Introduction to Interval Analysis , Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898717716 doi:10.1137/1.9780898717716 .DOI

Version history

  1. v1Submitted by Eric NaslundInitial depositCurrentOct 07, 2026