Submitted works

Advanced search

math.NT — Number Theory

Linnik's constant is at most 3.993.99

Contributed by Eric Naslund

Let P(a,q)P(a,q) denote the least prime congruent to aa modulo qq, where (a,q)=1(a,q)=1. We give a computer-assisted proof that P(a,q)≪q3.99P(a,q)\ll q^{3.99}, improving the exponent 55 of Xylouris. More precisely, P(a,q)<q3.99P(a,q)<q^{3.99} for every sufficiently large qq, uniformly in aa. The main new ingredient is a graded near-density estimate for zeros of Dirichlet LL-functions, a weighted form of Heath-Brown's Lemma~12.1 of the kind he asked for in 1992. We combine it with the zero-location estimates and far-density method of Heath-Brown and Xylouris. The second novelty is the scale of the case analysis. Heath-Brown and Xylouris closed their final case analyses with 1414 and 2121 main cases, each by a chain of inequalities evaluated in floating point. In this paper, with the help of advanced AI models, we can push this much further. The middle range of the first zero is divided into 44534453 root cases and 47884788 terminal cases, each closed by its own linear program. On 4,196,8794{,}196{,}879 threshold boxes these programs give 29,397,33629{,}397{,}336 linear relaxations, and exact integer certificates for all of them bound the normalized zero sum strictly below~11. Exceptional zeros and the remaining exterior range are treated separately. This case analysis is a kind of systematic brute force enabled by AI: an analysis of this size, with parameters tuned to each case, would be very laborious or nearly impossible to carry out by hand, and it lets the new estimate be applied separately in each case. The near-density lemma, certificate soundness, and a conditional passage from a certified case to a prime are formalized in Lean, assuming published analytic inputs and specified facts about zeros (PALOMAR-2026-10-01-000020 v1).

Primarily AI-generated textHuman understanding: some parts

math.CO — Combinatorics

An Exponent of 1.04273 for the Unit Distance Problem

Contributed by Eric Naslund

Let u(U)u(U) count the unordered pairs at distance one in a finite planar set UU. We construct finite sets UjU_j with ∣Uj∣→∞|U_j|\to\infty and u(Uj)/∣Uj∣1.04273→∞u(U_j)/|U_j|^{1.04273}\to\infty. The largest exponent previously claimed, 1.03581.0358, is in the author's unpublished manuscript. The method is the number-field construction of OpenAI and Sawin: unit distances come from elements of relative norm one in quadratic extensions, and the fields come from an infinite pro-22 class field tower. The new ingredients are quadratic extensions of mixed signature, with an exact average over their norm-one units, and a tower over the real quadratic field $\Q(\sqrt{241})$, in which 22, 33 and 55 split. Its Golod--Shafarevich function contains two copies of the local conditions at these primes but only one constant term, and the extra room lets the tower be ramified only above 22, 33 and 55; the root discriminant of its fields is about 286286. The relative zeta value is bounded through the zeta function of the degree-512512 field generated over $\Q(\sqrt{241})$ by the square roots of its {2,3,5}\{2,3,5\}-units, which is the product of the Dedekind zeta function of $\Q(\sqrt{241})$ and 255255 quadratic Hecke LL-functions. Finite facts and numerical inequalities are certified by exact computation and interval arithmetic. A significant portion of this work was verified in Lean, reducing the result with exponent 1.04271.0427 to an explicit zeta function inequality (Palomar registry, PALOMAR-2026-10-01-000018, version 1).

Primarily AI-generated textHuman understanding: some parts