Matching works

1 work

math.NT — Number Theory

A modular obstruction to the PP-adic Leopoldt conjecture for the Carlitz module

Contributed by Shawn Krisman

Let LL be a finite extension of K=Fq(θ)K=\mathbb{F}_q(\theta) and PP a monic prime of Fq[θ]\mathbb{F}_q[\theta]. Anglès asked whether the PP-adic Leopoldt defect of Taelman's module of units of the Carlitz module over LL always vanishes, and Lucas conjectured this, together with the equivalence "LP(E/OL)≠0L_P(E/\mathcal{O}_L)\neq 0 iff exp⁡E\exp_E is injective", for Anderson modules. We show that both statements fail. For every odd prime pp, the extension of Fp(θ)\mathbb{F}_p(\theta) generated by a root of zp−(−θ)p−2z−(−θ)p−1z^p-(-\theta)^{p-2}z-(-\theta)^{p-1} is real, has Galois group AGL(1,p)\mathrm{AGL}(1,p), and has positive PP-adic Leopoldt defect and vanishing PP-adic zeta value at s=1s=1 for every PP. The obstruction comes from modular representation theory at the infinite place. We attach to every separable L/KL/K an integer δgen(L)\delta_{\mathrm{gen}}(L), depending only on the Galois group of the Galois closure, its decomposition group at ∞\infty and the character by which this group acts on the Carlitz period, and prove that the PP-adic defect is at least δgen(L)\delta_{\mathrm{gen}}(L) for all PP. Using Bosser's PP-adic Baker-Brumer theorem, we prove that the defect vanishes for every PP for real abelian extensions and for abelian extensions with cyclic Sylow pp-subgroup. We also show that a vv-adic analogue of Papanikolas's algebraic independence theorem for Carlitz logarithms would imply that the defect equals δgen(L)\delta_{\mathrm{gen}}(L) in general.

Primarily AI-generated textHuman understanding: no partsCarlitz logarithmsCarlitz moduleDrinfeld modulesGoss zeta functionLeopoldt conjectureP-adic L-seriesTaelman unitsmodular representation theory

Advanced search

Text
Human understanding
Linked formalizations