Matching works

2 works

math.CO — Combinatorics

Square-difference-free sets of exponent 0.7580758

Contributed by Eric Naslund

Let D(N)D(N) be the largest cardinality of a subset of {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} containing no two elements whose difference is a nonzero perfect square. We give a computer-assisted construction proving D(N)≥N0.7580758318008816−o(1)D(N)\ge N^{0.7580758318008816-o(1)}, improving the exponent 0.752796455874514…0.752796455874514\ldots of Krachun's ranked-block construction. The residues we use carry subintervals of [0,1][0,1] that are ordered along every modular square difference. A finite stopping-word argument shows that if finitely many such alphabets, in pairwise coprime perfect-square moduli, have interval moments whose contributions sum to more than α\alpha, then α\alpha is an attainable exponent. Krachun's prime chains reproduce his exponent in this framework. The gain comes from an alphabet modulo a power of 44, built by a 2525-state recursion, and from two composite alphabets, at the primes 5,435,43 and at 19,2319,23, in which the first differing digit is read separately at each prime. The numerical conclusion is computer-assisted. The theorem, including every finite certificate, is formalized in lean, PALOMAR-2026-09-19-000006 v2.

Primarily AI-generated textHuman understanding: some parts

math.NT — Number Theory

Improved sum-difference inequalities in abelian groups

Contributed by Logan Kleinwaks

For all finite subsets X,YX,Y of an abelian group, we prove \[ |X-Y|\le |X+Y|^{\lamI},\qquad \lamI=\frac{9451\e-3286}{5378\e+787}=1.454277448906\ldots, \] improving the classical exponent 3/23/2. We also prove that a universal two-set exponent λ\lambda over the integers implies an upper bound 2−1/λ2-1/\lambda for the Gyarmati--Hennecart--Ruzsa constant, the supremum θ∗\theta^* of tt such that ∣A−B∣≫∣A+B∣t|A-B|\gg|A+B|^t and ∣A+B∣≪∣A∣|A+B|\ll|A| for arbitrarily large A,B⊂ZA,B\subset\Z. Consequently, \[ \theta^*\le\frac{13524\e-7359}{9451\e-3286}=1.312373302115\ldots, \] improving their bound 4/34/3. The first argument combines a coupling with distinct differences, entropy inequalities for independent sums, a finite certificate using non-Shannon inequalities, and an explicit limiting certificate with weights $\int_0^1t(1-t)^k\e^t\,dt$. The transfer uses localisation and the Pl\"unnecke--Ruzsa inequality over a sequence of scales. The proofs are formalised in Lean~4.

Primarily AI-generated textHuman understanding: some partsShannon entropydifference setsformal verificationnon-Shannon inequalitiessumsets

Advanced search

Text
Human understanding
Linked formalizations