On a counting conjecture for binary rich words
Version 2 / Nov 06, 2026 / CC BY 4.0
Abstract
Let denote the number of binary rich words of length . We prove that . Consequently, is not for any fixed , disproving the conjectured upper bound with . The proof combines independent permutation families through an ordered concatenation construction and a binary gap encoding.
Provenance statement
References
- A. Glen, J. Justin, S. Widmer, and L. Q. Zamboni, Palindromic richness, European Journal of Combinatorics 30 (2) (2009), 510--531. doi:10.1016/j.ejc.2008.04.006 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejc.2008.04.006).DOI
- C. Guo, J. Shallit, and A. M. Shur, On the combinatorics of palindromes and antipalindromes, arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.09112v1 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.09112v1) (2015).arXiv
- C. Guo, J. Shallit, and A. M. Shur, Palindromic rich words and run-length encodings, Information Processing Letters 116 (12) (2016), 735--738. doi:10.1016/j.ipl.2016.07.001 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipl.2016.07.001).DOI
- J. Rukavicka, Subexponential upper bound on the number of rich words, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.11069v3 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11069v3) (2026).arXiv
Version history
- v1 · 4 pagesSubmitted by Max Glass4 pages. Lean 4 formalization and paper source: https://github.com/glasss13/rich-word-counting.SupersededNov 06, 2026
- v2 · 4 pagesSubmitted by Max GlassFormatting correction to the web abstract: repaired math delimiters and removed hard line breaks. The paper and mathematical results are unchanged. 4 pages. Lean 4 formalization and paper source: https://github.com/glasss13/rich-word-counting.CurrentNov 06, 2026