Illumination of complex 1-unconditional convex bodies

Primarily AI-generated textHuman understanding: some partsmath.MG — Metric Geometry

Contributed by אלון שכטר ↗

Version 1 / Nov 02, 2026 / CC BY 4.0

Abstract

We study ordinary and fractional illumination of complex 11-unconditional convex bodies. In every complex dimension nn we give an explicit ordinary bound asymptotic to 3n+1/πn3^{n+1}/\sqrt{\pi n}, and prove $\ill^*(K)\le b_*^n$ and $\ill(K)=O(n\log(n+1)b_*^n)$, where b∗=2.4805534697…b_*=2.4805534697\ldots is defined by an explicit scalar equation. For normalized non-polydiscs in dimensions two, three and four, the sharp ordinary bounds are 66, 1414 and 3030. More generally, a full coordinate (n−1)(n-1)-polydisc gives the sharp bound 2n+1−22^{n+1}-2 in every dimension n≥2n\ge2. In dimension two we prove the fractional bound 44 and classify equality by the two maximal supporting coefficients at the coordinate axes. If every extreme point has all coordinates nonzero, we obtain the fractional bound 2n2^n, with equality exactly for the polydisc, and a quantitative strict bound otherwise. Appendices give the exact sizes of simultaneous illuminating families in dimensions one through five, the exact finite verification used in dimension four, and a numerical comparison of the general estimates through dimension 100100.

Provenance statement

Results generated with Chatgpt Astra-6. most of the content was examined by a human.

References

  1. S. Artstein-Avidan and B. A. Slomka, On weighted covering numbers and the Levi-Hadwiger conjecture , Israel J. Math. 209 (2015), no. 1, 125--155. doi:10.1007/s11856-015-1213-5 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-015-1213-5). For the locators used here, see arXiv:1310.7892v2 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.7892v2).arXivDOI
  2. V. Boltyanski and H. Martini, Illumination of direct vector sums of convex bodies , Studia Sci. Math. Hungar. 44 (2007), no. 3, 367--376. doi:10.1556/SScMath.44.2007.3.6 (https://doi.org/10.1556/SScMath.44.2007.3.6).DOI
  3. P. Hall, On representatives of subsets , J. London Math. Soc. s1-10 (1935), no. 1, 26--30. doi:10.1112/jlms/s1-10.37.26 (https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-10.37.26).DOI
  4. M. Naszódi, Fractional illumination of convex bodies , Contrib. Discrete Math. 4 (2009), no. 2, 83--88. doi:10.55016/ojs/cdm.v4i2.62022 (https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/cdm.v4i2.62022).DOI
  5. L. Rotem, A. Schejter, and B. A. Slomka, The complex Illumination problem , Combinatorica 46 , article 3 (2026). doi:10.1007/s00493-025-00195-7 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-025-00195-7). The theorem, proposition and remark numbers cited here refer to the published article.DOI
  6. L. Rotem, A. Schejter and B. Slomka, Illumination of Real and Complex 1-Symmetric Convex Bodies , unpublished manuscript, October 2026, 22 pages. The locators used here refer to the version with Theorems 1.5--1.8, Lemma 4.3 and Proposition 4.4.
  7. W. R. Sun and B.-H. Vritsiou, Illuminating 11-unconditional convex bodies in R3\mathbb R^3 and R4\mathbb R^4, and certain cases in higher dimensions , Canad. J. Math., accepted manuscript posted online 4 August 2025. doi:10.4153/S0008414X25101260 (https://doi.org/10.4153/S0008414X25101260). The theorem numbers used here refer to arXiv:2407.11331v1 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11331v1) (2024).arXivDOI
  8. W. R. Sun and B.-H. Vritsiou, On the illumination of 11-symmetric convex bodies , arXiv:2407.10314v1 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10314v1) (2024).arXiv

Version history

  1. v1Submitted by אלון שכטרInitial depositCurrentNov 01, 2026