\section{Overview of the construction} \label{rw:sec:descent-route} This section describes the proof of Theorem~\ref{rw:thm:III-main} without giving it. The construction starts from cusp forms on general linear groups, which exist by the theorem of L.~Lafforgue, and transports them to \(G\) by integral operators. Functions are present from the beginning, and the difficulty is to show that the operators do not annihilate them. In type \(A\) the parameter is lifted to a general linear group, and the correspondence of L.~Lafforgue applies (Theorem~\ref{fl:thm:type-a-realization}). The rest of this outline is about the symplectic and orthogonal cases. \emph{From the parameter to general linear groups.} Let \(\varrho=\operatorname{Std}\sigma\) be the composite of \(\sigma\) with the standard representation of \(\widehat G\). Since \(\sigma\) is elliptic, \(\varrho\) is a sum of pairwise nonisomorphic irreducible representations \(\varrho_i\), each of which preserves a form of the same type, symmetric or alternating (Proposition~\ref{fl:prop:prelim-block}). Each \(\varrho_i\) is the parameter of a cuspidal representation \(\Pi_i\) of a general linear group. The problem is to make a function on \(G\) out of the \(\Pi_i\). \emph{Orthogonal descent.} As in the work of Ginzburg, Rallis and Soudry, we regard the product of these general linear groups as a Levi subgroup of a classical group \(S\) about twice as large as \(G\), and form the Eisenstein series on \(S\) induced from the \(\Pi_i\). That \(\varrho_i\) preserves a form of the given type is reflected in a pole of an \(L\)-function of \(\Pi_i\), and this pole produces a pole of the Eisenstein series. Its residue is a space of functions on \(S(F)\backslash S(\mathbb A)\) which are square integrable modulo the centre (Section~\ref{fl:sec:common-descent}). The group \(S\) contains a unipotent subgroup \(U_{\rm desc}\) with a character \(\psi_{\rm desc}\) whose stabilizer contains \(G\). The \emph{descent} of a function \(E\) in the residue is the function \[ g\longmapsto\int_{U_{\rm desc}(F)\backslash U_{\rm desc}(\mathbb A)} E(ug)\,\psi_{\rm desc}(u)^{-1}\,du, \qquad g\in G(\mathbb A). \] In words: one integrates \(E\) over the directions of \(S\) which do not belong to \(G\), against a character, and what remains is a function on \(G(F)\backslash G(\mathbb A)\). \emph{Two separate questions.} At an unramified place the local component of the residue is a subquotient of an explicit induced representation, and the corresponding local operation, the Jacquet module twisted by \(\psi_{\rm desc}\), is exact. The twisted Jacquet module of the induced representation can be computed, and its unramified constituents have the Satake parameter of \(\sigma\) (Section~\ref{fl:sec:orthogonal-descent}). In the smallest case, the descent from \(\operatorname{SO}_5\) to a torus of dimension one, it is the sum of two characters, inverse to each other, if the torus is split, and it is zero otherwise (Section~\ref{rw:sec:smallest-case}). This gives the Hecke eigenvalues of the descent, provided the descent is not zero; it says nothing if it is zero. That the descent is not zero is a global statement. The residue has a nonzero Fourier coefficient of another kind, which comes from the Whittaker coefficients of the \(\Pi_i\) (Proposition~\ref{fl:lem:residual-analytic}). We show that the Whittaker coefficient of the descent is not zero by transforming one coefficient into the other. The tool is elementary (Lemma~\ref{fl:lem:odd-exchange}): when two unipotent subgroups \(X\) and \(Y\) are put in duality by the commutator and a character, an integral over \(Y(F)\backslash Y(\mathbb A)\) may be exchanged for an integral over \(X(F)\backslash X(\mathbb A)\) without affecting vanishing. A proof of nonvanishing is a sequence of such exchanges, sometimes a long one, and its whole difficulty is to keep track of the root subgroups involved (Sections~\ref{fl:sec:orthogonal-descent} and~\ref{fl:sec:odd-symplectic}). Figures~\ref{rw:fig:interleave}--\ref{rw:fig:char2-cross} show these subgroups in small cases. \emph{Small characteristic.} The exchanges rest on the commutator relations between root subgroups, with their structure constants, and on Fourier analysis on \(F\backslash\mathbb A\). For an odd orthogonal target the argument is the same in all characteristics, once the orthogonal group is defined by a quadratic form and not by a bilinear form. For an even orthogonal target one step moves a Fourier coefficient from the trivial character of a root subgroup to a nontrivial one, and in odd characteristic it does so by a computation in which a quadratic exponent is divided by two. In characteristic two we replace it by the following observation: the function \(a\mapsto\psi(sa^2)\) is then an additive character of \(a\), so it is of the form \(\psi(C_\psi(s)a)\), and the map \(C_\psi\), which is computed by the Cartier operator, is surjective (Section~\ref{fl:sec:char2-d}). \emph{Symplectic groups.} For a symplectic group we do not use a descent but the theta lift from an even orthogonal group, which on parameters adds a trivial line to the standard representation. Nonvanishing and the Hecke eigenvalues both follow from one computation, that of a Jacquet module of the Weil representation (Sections~\ref{fl:sec:odd-theta} and~\ref{fl:sec:classical-double-line}). \emph{From Hecke eigenvalues to the parameter.} In these cases the outcome is a nonzero function on \(G\) which has the Hecke eigenvalues of \(\sigma\) at almost all places and a nonzero Whittaker coefficient. This is less than what the theorem asserts, which concerns all excursion operators. The gap is closed by the arithmetic results of \cite{HuI}: such a function is cuspidal because \(\sigma\) is elliptic, the cusp forms with these Hecke eigenvalues have parameters whose standard representations are isomorphic to \(\varrho\), and for the groups in question this determines the parameter up to conjugacy, or up to the outer automorphism in the even orthogonal case, which is then dealt with separately (Proposition~\ref{fl:prop:prelim-full-parameter}).