\section{Divisor weights and the marked bilinear estimate} \label{sec:preliminaries} We use finite collections of small prime divisors to insert weights into bilinear sums. We give the definitions and the precise external estimate needed below. All numbers of bands and all band exponents in this section are fixed before $x$ tends to infinity. Put \[ L=\log x,\qquad w_x=\exp(L^{0.24}),\qquad V(y)=\prod_{p\leq y}\left(1-\frac1p\right). \] We write $P^-(n)$ for the least prime divisor of $n>1$, and put $P^-(1)=\infty$. A positive integer $n$ is $y$-rough if $P^-(n)>y$. Dirichlet characters, including principal characters, are extended by zero on integers not coprime to their modulus. \subsection{The divisor weights} Fix $K\geq1$ and $0.1<\alpha_1<\cdots<\alpha_K<0.2$. Set \[ \mathcal P_i=\{p\text{ prime}:\exp(L^{\alpha_i})\leq p\leq \exp(2L^{\alpha_i})\},\qquad V_i=\sum_{p\in\mathcal P_i}\frac1p, \qquad \omega_i(u)=\sum_{p\in\mathcal P_i}\mathbf1_{p\mid u}. \] The bands $\mathcal P_i$ are disjoint for large $x$, and $V_i=\log2+o(1)$. With $\rho=1/2$, define \begin{equation}\label{eq:array-weight} W(u)=\prod_{i=1}^K \frac{\omega_i(u)\rho^{\omega_i(u)-1}}{V_i}. \end{equation} The factor is zero when $\omega_i(u)=0$. We call the collection of bands, together with this weight, an \emph{array}. The weight is nonnegative, supported on integers having a prime divisor in every band, and bounded by a constant depending only on $K$ for large $x$. Equivalently, with $\omega_{\rm band}(u)=\sum_i\omega_i(u)$, \[ W(u)=\rho^{\omega_{\rm band}(u)-K} \sum_{\substack{p_i\in\mathcal P_i\ (1\leq i\leq K)\\ p_1\cdots p_K\mid u}} \prod_{i=1}^K V_i^{-1}. \] This identity specifies the normalization when one prime divisor is selected from each band. In particular, the sum over selected divisors is a counting sum; the reciprocal factors $1/p_i$ enter its mean. The \emph{independent divisor model} replaces the indicators $\mathbf1_{p\mid u}$, for all primes in the arrays under consideration, by independent Bernoulli variables of means $1/p$. Denote its expectation by $\mathbb E_x$, and put \begin{equation}\label{eq:array-mean} m_W=\mathbb E_x W. \end{equation} For example, independence between bands gives the exact formula \[ m_W=\prod_{i=1}^K \left\{ \prod_{p\in\mathcal P_i}\left(1-\frac{1-\rho}{p}\right) \frac1{V_i}\sum_{p\in\mathcal P_i}\frac1{p-(1-\rho)} \right\}. \] Consequently, for constants depending on $K$ but not on the fixed band exponents, \begin{equation}\label{eq:array-moments} 00$. Suppose that $H_m,H_n\geq x^\delta$ and $X=H_mH_n\asymp x$, with fixed comparison constants. Let $F$ satisfy $|F|\leq1$ and \eqref{eq:band-invariance}. Let $\alpha_m,\beta_n$ be supported on $w_x$-rough integers in $[H_m,2H_m]$ and $[H_n,2H_n]$, respectively, with $|\alpha_m|,|\beta_n|\leq L^C$. The support of $\alpha$ may be restricted to any interval $I\subseteq[H_m,2H_m]$. Assume that, for every fixed $A_0,B,A>0$, every Dirichlet character $\vartheta$ modulo $k\leq L^{A_0}$, and every $|t|\leq2XL^B$, \begin{equation}\label{eq:coefficient-test} \frac1{H_m}\left|\sum_m\alpha_m\vartheta(m)m^{it}\right| \ll_A L^{-A}, \end{equation} uniformly in the interval, character, and frequency. Constants in this hypothesis may depend on all fixed parameters defining the coefficient. Then, for sufficiently large fixed $K$, \begin{equation}\label{eq:marked-bilinear} \left|\sum_{m,n}\alpha_m\beta_n F(mn-1)W(mn-1)\right| \ll X L^{-D}. \end{equation} The required lower bound on $K$ is independent of the band exponents $\alpha_i$. The implicit constant and the threshold for $x$ may depend on those exponents and on all other fixed data. \end{proposition} The version with prime-minus-rough coefficients is \cite[Theorem~3.1]{PD}. In particular, the sequence \begin{equation}\label{eq:prime-rough-coefficient} \alpha_m=m^{iv} \left(\mathbf1_{m\text{ prime}} -\frac{\mathbf1_{P^-(m)>w_x}}{V(w_x)\log m}\right), \qquad |v|\leq L^C, \end{equation} restricted to a permitted interval, satisfies \eqref{eq:coefficient-test} by \cite[Lemma~5.2]{PD}. Multiplying this coefficient by a fixed Dirichlet character preserves the criterion: the product with a test character has modulus at most $M L^{A_0}\leq L^{A_0+1}$ for all sufficiently large $x$, where $M$ is fixed. This observation will be used for fixed arithmetic progressions. \subsection{Removing the divisor weights at primes} We also record the positive estimate that will remove these weights. Choose $b$ arrays $W_1,\ldots,W_b$, each with $K$ bands, so that all their band exponents are distinct. Write $m_j=\mathbb E_xW_j$ and \[ Z_b(u)=\left(\frac1b\sum_{j=1}^b\frac{W_j(u)}{m_j}-1\right)^2. \] Disjoint arrays are independent in the divisor model. Thus \begin{equation}\label{eq:model-array-variance} \mathbb E_x Z_b =\frac1{b^2}\sum_{j=1}^b \operatorname{Var}_x(W_j/m_j) \leq \frac{C_K}{b}. \end{equation} For every fixed nonnegative smooth compactly supported $\Phi$ on $(0,\infty)$, the prime version is \begin{equation}\label{eq:array-variance} \limsup_{x\to\infty}\frac{L}{x} \sum_{p\text{ prime}}\Phi((p-1)/x)Z_b(p-1) \ll_\Phi\frac{C_K}{b}. \end{equation} The constant is independent of $b$ and of the fixed band exponents. Here and below $b$ is fixed while taking the limit in $x$. For completeness, this estimate uses only the progression calculation and the positive sieve in \cite[\S7]{PD}. The summed progression estimate of \cite[Lemma~7.2]{PD}, with the large-prime statistic omitted, applies to $Z_b$: its expansion contains constants, single arrays, and products of two arrays, including repeated arrays. Apply the upper bound in the block sieve of \cite[Lemma~2.6]{PD} at depth $2$, with $z=x^{c_0/20}$ for a fixed permitted progression exponent $c_0>0$. Its divisor level is $z^{10}=x^{c_0/2}$, inside that progression range. Every prime $p$ in the support exceeds $z$, so its contribution is bounded by the sifted nonnegative weight. The main term is $O_\Phi(x\mathbb E_xZ_b/\log z)$, and the summed remainder is $o(x/L)$. Equation~\eqref{eq:model-array-variance} proves \eqref{eq:array-variance}. In particular, if $|a_p|\leq C$ at primes, Cauchy's inequality and the prime number theorem give \begin{equation}\label{eq:array-removal} \limsup_{x\to\infty}\frac Lx \left|\sum_p\Phi((p-1)/x)a_p \left(\frac1b\sum_{j=1}^b\frac{W_j(p-1)}{m_j}-1\right)\right| \ll_{\Phi,C}\sqrt{\frac{C_K}{b}}. \end{equation} This estimate concerns bounded prime coefficients; it requires no bound for their extension to composite integers.