\section{Introduction and exact results}\label{sec:intro} Higher-order autocorrelations are translation invariants built from products of a function along several shifted copies. Their use in pattern recognition and periodic reconstruction has a long history \cite{AdlerKonheim1962,McLaughlinRaviv1968,ChazanWeiss1970, KakaralaIverson1993}. On a finite cyclic group, the Fourier transform converts an order-$k$ autocorrelation into products over zero-sum $k$-tuples. This makes reconstruction below the classical global order-six line of Gr\"unbaum--Moore \cite{GrunbaumMoore1995} a problem about the integral generation of zero-sum relations. The answer depends sharply on the exact Fourier support. For a support $S\subset C_n$, let $\calL_{\le d}(S)$ be generated by the nonnegative zero-sum multiplicity vectors of length at most $d$, and let $K(S)$ be the full integral relation lattice. We call \[ \depth(S)=\min\{d:\calL_{\le d}(S)=K(S)\} \] the local closing degree. Section~\ref{sec:zero-sum} identifies it with the maximum separating-atom length on $S$, using the established quotient-group language of Schefler--Zhao--Zhong \cite{ScheflerZhaoZhong2026}. Section~\ref{sec:phase} explains why the same lattice controls phase ratios invisible to autocorrelations. We compute this object in two directions. The first is a signal-level theorem and complete ambiguity parametrization for the exact unit support of every even cyclic group. The second is a complete supportwise classification when the group order is $2pq$, together with exact rational and integer thresholds and explicit lower-bound pairs on every stable support of depth greater than one. The sole depth-one support is direct. Their common row is the unit orbit. \subsection{The orbit-stable classification} Let $p3\text{ prime},\ 2\ell^k>10). \tag{1.0b} \] Pebody later conjectured value four for every even cyclic order greater than ten and reported that his method covered many even orders, including every one below $240$ \cite{Pebody2007}. Theorem \ref{thm:set-reconstruction} adds the arithmetically disjoint squarefree family $2pq$, with two distinct odd prime factors, inside that conjectural line; no absolute priority or firstness assertion is made. The proof is uniform in the primes. It does not arise from interpolation of finite atlases. We first compute the cumulative degree-two, degree-three and degree-four presentations of seven nonzero CRT boxes. Exactly nineteen cubic box-count patterns can occur. Five propagation lemmas convert them into a ten-clause criterion selecting exactly 77 of the 127 nonempty seven-box masks; ten explicit defect families prove the converse. At order four, fourteen connector types reduce the generic branch to complete primary-coordinate graphs and the $p=3$ branch to a fixed six-coordinate integral presentation. The remaining masks are two depth-five bridges and one or seven depth-six critical bases. Adding the optional zero orbit doubles every base row and gives the two displayed profiles. The ordinary separating Noether number is a different invariant: it maximizes over modules and supports, and its exact finite-abelian value belongs to the separating-invariant literature \cite{Huang2026}. Theorem~\ref{thm:profiles} is a supportwise distribution restricted to the eight order orbits of one cyclic group. There is also a closer general framework. Domokos characterizes separating monomials by integral generation of zero-sum sequence monoids, first for diagonalizable actions and then, over non-closed fields, by imposing the criterion on every Galois-stable character subset \cite{Domokos2023,Domokos2026}. That criterion explains why the stable supports considered here are the natural local objects. It does not give the least truncation degree for any prescribed support, the ten-clause Cubic Skeleton, either arithmetic profile, or the exact unit-support quotient. Theorem~\ref{thm:profiles} computes precisely this supportwise layer for the regular representation of $C_{2pq}$. \subsection{Exact unit supports} Write $\units n=(\Z/n\Z)^\times$. The second theorem begins with an integral dichotomy and then performs the Galois descent needed for rational signals. \begin{theorem}[Even unit-support dichotomy and signal classification] \label{thm:unit-main} Let $n$ be even. \begin{enumerate} \item The fourth-order quotient is \[ \Z^{\units n}/\calL_{\le4}(\units n)\cong \begin{cases} C_n,&3\nmid n,\\ \Z\oplus C_{n/6},&6\mid n. \end{cases} \tag{1.1} \] If $6\mid n$, then $\calL_{\le6}(\units n)=K(\units n)$. In every even modulus, $\calL_{\le5}(\units n)=\calL_{\le4}(\units n)$. \item If $3\nmid n$, every two rational-valued signals with exact Fourier support $\units n$ and equal autocorrelations through order four differ by a translation. \item If $n=6m$, every pair with exact support $\units n$ and equal data through order four has, after translating the second signal, the form \[ \widehat f(u)=\sigma_u(\alpha),\qquad \widehat g(u)=\sigma_u(z\alpha), \tag{1.2} \] where $\alpha\in\Q(\zeta_n)^\times$ and $z\in\Q(\zeta_6)^\times$ satisfies $z\overline z=1$. Conversely every pair in \emph{(1.2)} agrees through order five, and hence through order four. Normalized parameters are translation-equivalent exactly modulo $\mu_6$, and equality at order six is equivalent to $z^6=1$. \end{enumerate} \end{theorem} The integral calculation uses a universal ambient group for the sifted set \[ T_{q,c}=\{t\in C_q:\gcd(1+ct,q)=1\}. \] It is a concrete use of the Freiman-homomorphism framework of Konyagin--Lev and Grynkiewicz \cite{KonyaginLev2000,Grynkiewicz2013}. The exceptional free direction is not an arbitrary cyclotomic effect: it is the second admissible class modulo three. After translation and rational descent, the relative phase lies in the quadratic subfield even though the common amplitude ranges over the full cyclotomic field. \begin{corollary}[The common unit row]\label{cor:unit-row} For $n=2pq$, the unit support is the single orbit $\units{2pq}=\Orb{2pq}$. Its closing degree is \[ \depth(\units{2pq})= \begin{cases} 6,&p=3,\\ 4,&p,q\ge5. \end{cases} \] Theorem~\ref{thm:profiles} and Theorem~\ref{thm:unit-main} therefore agree on their literal common support. \end{corollary} \begin{corollary}[$\units{30}$]\label{cor:u30-intro} For exact support $\units{30}$, formula \emph{(1.2)} is the complete rational classification through both orders four and five. The larger field $\Q(\zeta_{30})$ enlarges the common amplitude $\alpha$, while the relative phase remains in the norm-one torus of $\Q(\zeta_6)$. \end{corollary} This specializes to the question raised by Agulnick--Busick-Warner \cite{AgulnickBusickWarner2026}; Section~\ref{sec:signals} gives the precise comparison. The Fourier monomial and Galois criteria used in passing from lattices to signals are due to Casper--Orozco \cite{CasperOrozco2026}. \subsection{Claim levels and organization} The distinction between the two headline conclusions is binding. On the unit support, all surviving lattice characters are classified and rationally realized. On all 255 supports, we determine the exact rational and integer thresholds; whenever the depth exceeds one, we construct at least one Galois-equivariant lower-bound ratio for the failure immediately below closure. The sole depth-one support is handled directly. We do not classify the complete rational ambiguity torus on every atlas row. Sections~\ref{sec:zero-sum}--\ref{sec:signals} establish the common dictionary and the unit-support theorem. Sections~\ref{sec:boxes}--\ref{sec:profiles} prove the $2pq$ lattice classification. Section~\ref{sec:galois} constructs the nontrivial supportwise rational and integer lower-bound pairs and proves Theorem~\ref{thm:uniform-descent}. Section~\ref{sec:set-reconstruction} specializes the classifier to binary indicators, proves Theorem~\ref{thm:set-reconstruction}, and records the oriented-deck translation/reflection corollary. Section~\ref{sec:interpretation} returns to autocorrelation and literature boundaries. The appendices record the full connector and Boolean tables and separate computational assurance from proof. \begin{proofboundary} No absolute priority or firstness assertion is made. The binary phase/deck crosswalk is part of the Pebody--Gr\"unbaum--Moore--Simon lineage, and the even three-deck lower bound is imported from Keleti--Kolountzakis. The generic critical support used later is the sharpness family of Casper--Orozco; the global sixth-order line and the ratio-character method have earlier sources. The general non-closed-field separating criterion is Domokos's. The contribution certified here is the displayed fixed-support theorem chain, its exact supportwise classification, and the explicit Galois-equivariant realization of every nontrivial lower-bound layer. \end{proofboundary}