\section{Choosing the endpoints}\label{sec:endpoints} \subsection{A uniform choice for every count} For fixed $B,r,u$ and $e_*$, the numerator contribution to $\tfrac12\log U$ in \eqref{eq:U} is proportional to $m$. Differentiation adds the denominator cost $(m-1)\log e_*$. Put $a_B=C_B-1$. We take the pole order $a=ma_B$ to offset both costs. Its endpoint is $a+m-1=m(a_B+1)-1=C_Bm-1$, linear in $m$. The following estimates show that this scale suffices. Take $r=2$, $L=5$, $u=1/100$, $e_0=68/25$ and $a=ma_B$. Every denominator $d$ is odd, so its prime divisors are at least $3$ and $\lceil5/(p-1)\rceil\le3$. Consequently \begin{equation}\label{eq:K-bound} A_d=(2d)^5\prod_{p\mid d}p^{\lceil5/(p-1)\rceil} \le2^5d^8,\qquad K\le2^{5D}M^{8D}. \end{equation} We have $a_B\ge18D>5D$. The exact rational inequality \begin{equation}\label{eq:f18} 1001\left(\frac{401}{601}\right)^{18}<1 \end{equation} therefore gives \[ f(u)\le \left[1001\left(\frac{401}{601}\right)^{18}\right]^{mD}<1. \] Put $A=\log(27/(4e_0))$. The exponential series gives $163/60<\ep<68/25$. The following exact comparisons control the numerator growth and the decay gained from $a$: \begin{align} \frac{1001}{50}&<\left(\frac{163}{60}\right)^3, &\log(20.02)&<3,\label{eq:log20}\\ 4^{10}e_0^{19}&<27^{10}, &A&>\frac9{10},\label{eq:slope}\\ e_0&<\sum_{j=0}^5\frac{(11/10)^j}{j!}, &\log e_0&<\frac{11}{10}.\label{eq:log-e0} \end{align} For \eqref{eq:slope}, the rational comparison implies $10A>9\log e_0>9$. Using \eqref{eq:U} and \eqref{eq:K-bound}, \begin{align*} \frac12\log U &=m\bigl(\log K+5D\log(10.01)-Aa_B\bigr) +(m-1)\log e_0\\ &\ep. \end{equation} The tail bound follows by replacing all subsequent factorial ratios by a geometric series. The following choices satisfy $a>mDL$ and the two rational inequalities in Proposition~\ref{prop:criterion}. All rows use $r=2$, the bound \eqref{eq:e-tight}, and $u=t/10^{12}$ with the integer $t$ shown. The endpoint is $s=a+m-1$. \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{@{}rrrrrr@{}} \toprule $m$&$B$&$a$&$s$&$t$&$U$ (approx.)\\ \midrule 1&2&70&70&779643543&0.09965\\ 1&3&186&186&209514585&0.03463\\ 1&4&360&360&132973689&0.96654\\ 1&5&554&554&73388877&0.16375\\ 1&10&2794&2794&11811809&0.26283\\ 3&1&52&54&8990232707&0.49983\\ 5&1&88&92&8058760219&0.10513\\ 7&1&122&128&8645692609&0.84652\\ 19&1&334&352&8128616097&0.10743\\ 19&2&1326&1344&802179083&0.58430\\ 19&3&3520&3538&218654559&0.08821\\ 99&1&1740&1838&8139253515&0.07226\\ \bottomrule \end{tabular} \end{center} The decimals illustrate the margins; all comparisons are exact over $\Q$. These rows prove the individual intervals in the introduction. For example, $m=19$, $B=2$ gives two irrational values among $\beta(20),\beta(22),\ldots,\beta(1344)$. The accompanying endpoint file contains $21$ certificates in total, including additional choices for counts $4$, $5$ and $10$.