\subsection{Transverse variation of the remaining core} \label{sec:partial-core-multipliers} The radius estimate controls the direction in which an initial curve reaches the outgoing section. We now compare its two transverse derivatives with this radial speed. The strong wall decays exponentially during the remaining passage. The weak wall needs no comparable contraction: its relative derivative grows more slowly than the radial speed. Together these estimates place the outgoing curve in a narrow radial cone. For an initial state $y_0$ satisfying \eqref{eq:partial-core-initial-state}, keep the notation $k,u_0,P_0,\alpha,\beta$ of the preceding subsection. Write \[ (r_*,u_*,w_*)=\mathcal R_\downarrow(y_0). \] The last coordinate is the outgoing wall $W$, since $V=1$ at the return. Let $L_U,L_P$ be the angular rates in \eqref{eq:core-logarithmic-rates}. Along the actual orbit, put $q=dz/dt=ARd$ and define \begin{equation} \mu_j(y)=\exp\left( \int_0^{\tau_\downarrow(y)} q(t;y)L_j(z(t;y),\mathcal Y(t;y))\dd t\right), \qquad j\in\{U,P\}. \label{eq:partial-core-multipliers} \end{equation} Here $\mathcal Y=(R,U,P)$ and the downward return time is the one defined in \eqref{eq:partial-core-oriented-return}. The scalar wall equations give \begin{equation} u_*(y)=U(y)\mu_U(y),\qquad w_*(y)=V(y)W(y)\mu_P(y). \label{eq:partial-core-multiplier-formula} \end{equation} These identities hold on an ordinary neighborhood of $y_0$. Indeed, the compact base segment has positive $V$, projective denominator and angular denominator $d$. Continuous dependence and the smooth return time preserve these inequalities along every nearby segment. The original flow and the integrands in \eqref{eq:partial-core-multipliers} are jointly $C^1$ there. Thus $\mu_U,\mu_P$ and their logarithms are $C^1$ on that neighborhood, and both multipliers are strictly positive. This construction includes the incoming boundary $V_0=1$ and zero transverse walls. \begin{proposition} \label{prop:partial-core-log-multipliers} For $w\in\R^4$, let $v=D\mathcal C(y_0)w$, $\delta z=Dz(y_0)w$, and \[ Q_0=|v_R|+k|v_U|+|v_P|+(k^2u_0+P_0/k)|\delta z|. \] Then \begin{align} |D\log\mu_U(y_0)w| &\leq40K_v\log(4k)Q_0+2k|\delta z|,\notag\\ |D\log\mu_P(y_0)w| &\leq236K_v\frac{\log(4k)}{k^2}Q_0 +\frac4k|\delta z|. \label{eq:partial-core-log-multipliers} \end{align} \end{proposition} \begin{proof} Let $\xi$ be the variation at fixed angle. By \eqref{eq:partial-core-variation-growth}, $\|S_k\xi\|_\infty\leq Q=4K_vQ_0$ throughout the passage. With $x=k\xi_U$, the rate bounds \eqref{eq:core-log-rate-variation} give \[ |D_{\mathcal Y}L_U\xi|\leq3Q,\qquad |D_{\mathcal Y}L_P\xi| \leq\frac{9Q}{k^2}+\frac8k|x|. \] The angle interval has length at most $2\log(4k)$. Moreover, \eqref{eq:partial-core-strong-integral} implies \[ \frac8k\int_\alpha^\beta|x|\dd z \leq\frac{32|x(\alpha)|+384u_0Q}{k^2} \leq\frac{33Q}{k^2}, \] because $|x(\alpha)|\leq Q$ and $u_0\leq1/60000$. Consequently, for $I_j=\int_\alpha^\beta D_{\mathcal Y}L_j\xi\dd z$, \begin{equation} |I_U|\leq6\log(4k)Q,\qquad |I_P|\leq51\frac{\log(4k)}{k^2}Q. \label{eq:partial-core-log-integrals} \end{equation} Differentiating the original-time integral in \eqref{eq:partial-core-multipliers} yields \begin{equation*} D\log\mu_j(y_0)w =I_j+L_j(\beta,\mathcal Y_*)D\beta(y_0)w -L_j(\alpha,\mathcal Y_0)\delta z. \end{equation*} This is the moving-endpoint identity \eqref{eq:core-moving-multiplier-derivative} with the actual initial angle. More explicitly, if $\zeta$ is the angle variation at fixed original time, the identity \[ \delta(qL_j)=qD_{\mathcal Y}L_j\xi +\frac{d}{dt}(L_j\zeta) \] leaves the lower term $-L_j(\alpha,\mathcal Y_0)\delta z$. At the upper endpoint, $\zeta(t_*)+q(t_*)D\tau_\downarrow(y_0)w =D\beta(y_0)w$. The exit tangency calculation used in \eqref{eq:core-moving-angle-bounds} applies to this same downward branch. It gives \[ |D\beta(y_0)w|\leq\frac{2|\xi_R(\beta)|}{k} \leq\frac{2Q}{k}. \] Together with $|L_U|\leq2k$ and $|L_P|\leq4/k$, this bounds the upper endpoint terms by $4Q$ and $8Q/k^2$, respectively. The lower terms are bounded by $2k|\delta z|$ and $4|\delta z|/k$. Combining these estimates with \eqref{eq:partial-core-log-integrals} and $\log(4k)\geq1$ gives \[ |D\log\mu_Uw|\leq10\log(4k)Q+2k|\delta z|, \qquad |D\log\mu_Pw|\leq59\frac{\log(4k)}{k^2}Q +\frac4k|\delta z|. \] Substitute $Q=4K_vQ_0$. \end{proof} Let $Y(\rho)$ be an ordinarily differentiable family of projective states. As in Proposition~\ref{prop:partial-core-radial-family}, write \[ k=r(Y(\rho)),\quad U=Y_1(\rho),\quad \Pin=Y_2(\rho)Y_3(\rho),\quad z=z(Y(\rho)),\quad (f,u_+,w_+)=\mathcal R_\downarrow(Y(\rho)). \] Primes in the rest of this subsection denote ordinary derivatives with respect to $\rho$ at the point under consideration. The scale $a$ is held fixed. \begin{proposition} \label{prop:partial-core-radial-multipliers} Suppose that $Y(\rho)$ satisfies \eqref{eq:partial-core-initial-state}, $00$ and $\cosh\beta=r_*\geq99k/100$. Thus $Z\leq\beta$ and \[ \frac{99}{50}\leq\frac{\cosh\beta}{\cosh Z} \leq e^{\beta-Z}. \] The second inequality follows from the addition formula for $\cosh$ and $0\leq\tanh Z\leq1$. Since $\log x\geq1-1/x$ for $x>0$, \[ \beta-\alpha\geq\log(99/50)\geq49/99>1/3. \] Integrating the coefficient bounds $L_U\leq-k/4$ and $L_P\leq0$ proves \eqref{eq:partial-core-wall-contraction}. \end{proof} \begin{theorem} \label{thm:partial-core-radial-cone} Assume the hypotheses of Proposition~\ref{prop:partial-core-radial-family}, and let $A_m,B_m$ be as in \eqref{eq:partial-core-radial-multiplier-constants}. Suppose in addition that, for some $D>0$ and $Z\geq0$, \begin{equation} -k'\geq\frac1{Da^2},\qquad 2\cosh Z\leq k,\qquad z\leq Z,\qquad 4C_pK^2(U+a\Pin)\leq\frac1{2D}. \label{eq:partial-core-cone-input} \end{equation} Then \begin{equation} -f'\geq\frac1{2Da^2},\qquad |f'|\leq\frac{K+1/(2D)}{a^2}, \label{eq:partial-core-cone-radial-speed} \end{equation} and $0\leq u_+\leq Ue^{-k/12}$, $0\leq w_+\leq \Pin$. The transverse derivatives satisfy \begin{align} |u_+'| &\leq 2D(K+24A_m)\sqrt U\,\sqrt{u_+}\,|f'|, \notag\\ |w_+'| &\leq 2DK(1+B_m)a\sqrt \Pin\,\sqrt{w_+}\,|f'|. \label{eq:partial-core-radial-cone} \end{align} The zero-wall conclusions of Proposition~\ref{prop:partial-core-radial-multipliers} hold as well. \end{theorem} \begin{proof} The derivative error \eqref{eq:partial-core-family-radius-error} and \eqref{eq:partial-core-cone-input} give \[ |f'-k'|\leq\frac1{2Da^2}. \] Combining this with the lower bound for $-k'$ and the upper bound for $|k'|$ proves \eqref{eq:partial-core-cone-radial-speed}. Lemma~\ref{lem:partial-core-wall-contraction} supplies the two value bounds. The stronger lower radius bound $2/(Ka)\leq k$ implies $1/k\leq Ka$, so Proposition~\ref{prop:partial-core-radial-multipliers} applies. For the strong wall, take a square root in its value bound: $\sqrt{u_+}\leq\sqrt U\,e^{-k/24}$. For $k\geq6$, we have $\log(4k)\leq k$ and $e^{-k/24}\log(4k)\leq24$. The latter follows from $xe^{-x}\leq1$ at $x=k/24$. Since $a\leq1$, \[ e^{-k/24}\left(\frac Ka+\frac{A_mL}{a^2}\right) \leq\frac{K+24A_m}{a^2}. \] Factor one square root from $u_+$ in \eqref{eq:partial-core-radial-wall-bounds} to obtain \[ |u_+'|\leq\sqrt{u_+}\sqrt U\,\frac{K+24A_m}{a^2}. \] For the weak wall, $\sqrt{w_+}\leq\sqrt \Pin$ and $L\leq k\leq K/a$ give \[ |w_+'|\leq\sqrt{w_+}\sqrt \Pin\,\frac{K(1+B_m)}a. \] Finally, $1\leq2Da^2|f'|$ converts these two inequalities into \eqref{eq:partial-core-radial-cone}. All factors are nonnegative, and no division by a wall amplitude has been used. \end{proof} \begin{corollary} \label{cor:small-section-partial-core-cone} The constants $h_*,K$ in Corollary~\ref{cor:small-section-partial-core-response} can also be used for the following conclusion. For $03$, $\ell>4$ and sufficiently small $a>0$, every positive-shear input in that corollary with $V\geq1$ satisfies \eqref{eq:partial-core-cone-radial-speed} and \eqref{eq:partial-core-radial-cone} with $D=4096$. Its outgoing walls satisfy $0\leq u_+\leq Ue^{-k/12}$ and $0\leq w_+\leq \Pin$. These are the walls on the original orbit at its first $V=1$ event strictly after $T=(q/2)\log(1/a)$. \end{corollary} \begin{proof} Proposition~\ref{prop:small-section-core-data} gives $-k'\geq1/(4096a^2)$, $z\leq0$ and $U+\Pin\leq1/k$. Use $Z=0$, for which $2\cosh Z\leq k$ follows from $k\geq6$. The radius bound gives $1/k\leq Ka$, so $U+a\Pin\leq U+\Pin\leq Ka$. Restrict the scale further to \[ a\leq\frac1{8C_pK^3\cdot4096}. \] Then $4C_pK^2(U+a\Pin)\leq1/(2\cdot4096)$. All hypotheses of Theorem~\ref{thm:partial-core-radial-cone} hold. The orbit and first-event identities follow from the same time shift as in Corollary~\ref{cor:small-section-partial-core-response}. \end{proof} The two cone coefficients depend on $\sqrt U$ and $a\sqrt \Pin$, respectively. The exponential decay absorbs the logarithmic derivative of the strong multiplier. For the weak wall, the extra factor $a$ comes from comparing a derivative of order $a^{-1}$ with a radial speed of order $a^{-2}$. This is the quantitative transverse control needed to continue the outgoing curve through the following connection.