\subsection{A growing wall away from Taub} \label{sec:late-wall-entrance} We now bring a physical orbit into the core coordinates of the preceding subsection. Throughout this step the orbit is assumed to stay at least $\epsilon>0$ from every Taub point. Decay of the pairwise wall products will make the transverse core amplitudes as small as needed. For $\Delta\geq0$, write \begin{equation} \mathcal P_\Delta(q):\quad 4N_i(q)N_j(q)\leq\Delta^2\quad(i\ne j). \label{eq:small-pairwise-products} \end{equation} The constraint immediately gives, when $\Delta\leq1/4$, \begin{equation} p^2+s^2+N_1^2+N_2^2+N_3^2 \leq1+\tfrac32\Delta^2\leq35/32, \qquad |p|<17/16. \label{eq:pair-product-state-bound} \end{equation} \begin{lemma}[Leaving a dominant wall] \label{lem:dominant-wall-exit} Let $0<\nu\leq1/4$ and $0\leq\Delta\leq\nu/8$. If~\eqref{eq:small-pairwise-products} holds on an interval of length $5/\nu^2$, then that interval contains a point at which all three walls are less than $\nu$. \end{lemma} \begin{proof} If the walls are initially below $\nu$, there is nothing to prove. Otherwise permute axes so that $n=N_1\geq\nu$ initially, and write $b=N_2$, $c=N_3$. As long as $n\geq\nu$, \[ b+c\leq\frac{\Delta^2}{2n}\leq\frac{\nu}{128} \leq\frac n{16}. \] The first shear equation can be written exactly as \[ p'=(p-2)n^2+(1+p)(b-c)^2+(1-2p)n(b+c). \] Using~\eqref{eq:pair-product-state-bound}, the three terms are bounded above by $-15n^2/16$, $3n^2/256$, and $n^2/4$, respectively. Their sum is at most $-n^2/2\leq-\nu^2/2$. The bound $|p|<17/16$ makes a stay of length $5/\nu^2$ impossible. There is therefore a time $T$ in the interval with $n(T)<\nu$. By continuity, between the initial time and $T$ the wall takes the value $(\nu+n(T))/2\in[\nu/2,\nu)$. At this time the product bounds give $b+c\leq\Delta^2/\nu<\nu$. All three walls are then strictly below $\nu$. \end{proof} \begin{lemma}[One growing direction] \label{lem:away-wall-growth-gap} For each $\epsilon>0$, there are $0<\nu_0\leq1/4$ and $01/2$ the first is positive and $3s^2<(1+p)^2$ makes the other two negative. If $-1s$, and an axis $i$ such that all walls are less than $\nu$ at $s$, and $T$ is their first subsequent arrival at height $\nu$. Only the $i$th wall arrives, and \[ N_i'(T)=\lambda_i(T)\nu\geq c\nu>0. \] \end{proposition} \begin{proof} Lemma~\ref{lem:dominant-wall-exit} supplies $s$. Until the first height-$\nu$ arrival, Lemma~\ref{lem:away-wall-growth-gap} applies. Its growing index is constant on every connected time interval: a change would force one continuous rate to pass through zero, contrary to the gap. Hence one wall grows at least exponentially with rate $c$, and the other two decrease strictly. There must be an arrival in finite time. Indeed, if no wall reached $\nu$, the same index would remain growing for all future time and $N_i(t)\geq N_i(s)e^{c(t-s)}$ would contradict $N_i(t)<\nu$. Continuity of the maximum of the walls gives a first arrival, and the two decreasing walls remain strictly below their values at $s$. The rate gap persists at the endpoint, proving transversality. \end{proof}